R[E]D – Research : Emotion : Design

A Brand Research and Development Strategy Firm


Leave a comment

What B2B Buyers Want From Vendor Websites

Easily accessible contact information is the most import thing on a B2B vendor website, according to a recent report from Dianna Huff and KoMarketing Associates.

Over two-thirds (68%) of B2B buyers say a vendor’s address and contact information is critically important on a site and 55% indicate they’ll leave if it isn’t available.

Moreover, 51% of buyers say having thorough contact/about information is the best way for a vendor’s website to establish credibility.

Most of the B2B buyers surveyed (81%) say they like to contact vendors via email; telephone is the second choice (58%). Only 39% like to use a contact form, yet that is the most common option provided by vendors.

contact-komarketing

 Below, additional key findings from the report, which was based on data from a survey of 175 B2B buyers.

‘Must Have’ Content

        • After contact information, buyers say pricing is the most important content on a vendor website; 43% of respondents say it is a “must have.”
        • 38% say technical support information is key, and the same proportion say case studies, whitepapers, articles, and blog posts are essential.

must-have-komarketing

Homepage Expectations

        • 90% of buyers want to see product/services information on vendors’ homepages.
        • Buyers also want to see about/company information (61%), marketing collateral (37%), and testimonials (36%).
        • Fewer buyers look for social media buttons (24%) or links to a blog (22%).

homepage-have-komarketing

Why Buyers Leave Sites

        • Asked which website elements annoy them or cause them to click out of a page, most respondents (93%) cited video or audio that plays automatically.
        • Buyers also do not like animated ads that crawl across the page or pop ups (88%), lack of message/can’t tell what a company offers (83%), and lack of contact information (79%).

leave-komarketing

Author / Ayaz Nanji
Source / marketingprofs.com


Leave a comment

Do You Need a Style Guide? Answer: Yes

It’s a simple question: Do you need a style guide? And it has a simple answer: Yes. Any brand, company, blog or webpage that wants to create and maintain consistency and a professional feel should have a style guide.

Style guides are a must for any publisher with multiple employees. This is especially important if more than one person will work on any brand elements (from the website to printed materials), and to ensure that transitions between employees are seamless in the eyes of users. Today, we take a look at well-documented style guide from MailChimp, and highlight things you can take away in creating your own document for the first time.

What Is a Style Guide?

 mailchimp-release

A style guide is the ultimate resource for visual and writing tone for your brand. The guidebook is not intended to be read cover to cover (and should not be written that way), and should be organized as a simple resource manual.

Style guides cover two big areas: visuals and writing. For website or app development, a style guide may contain a third area, defining how the user interface should work or coding specifics.

A style guide is a fluid document and once written should be updated regularly. When creating this document, consider how it will look and be used during the process. Your style guide should follow the styles defined. Use your brand’s color palette and the same writing style that you would like to be associated with the brand.

MailChimp’s “Voice and Tone” style guide follows this concept. The tone is simple and the guide looks and feels like the website. In addition, MailChimp also has a “Brand Assets” guide for how visual elements are used.

Getting Started

mailchimp-logo

Creating a style guide from scratch is not a task that you can complete in an hour. It will take some planning and time. But once the document is created and if updated regularly, it can be a time-saver in the long run. Before you write the first word of instruction, gather (or create) this list of materials to make compiling your guide that much easier.

Branding definitions, styles and logotypes: This includes examples of how logos can and can’t be used, as well as fonts, sizes and color swatches.

Font palette: List all the typefaces, sizes and colors that are acceptable. Include specs for how each is used from styles for body type, headers, quotes, labels, captions, navigation elements and so on.

Images, icons and buttons: Define style, color, size and placement of each.

Styles for forms or calls to action: Define what type of information can be collected and how data collection works. Write and include disclaimer information.

Basic layout: What is the basic template for your design? Include a few examples for how your letterhead, printed materials or web pages should look.

Visual Style

 

mailchimp-mascot

mailchimp-color

The visuals section of the style guide includes several key parts: acceptable fonts and use, including normal, bold, italic and special styles; color and size for typefaces; settings for bullets or lists; color palette; and image guidelines, such as size, border specs and uses such as text wrap or image and text combinations.

These styles should be written in simple and clear language and include technical specs, such as complete font names, color mix swatches (in RGB, CMYK or Pantone) and usage guidelines for web and print (if applicable). Some brands have both a print and web style guide; other brands opt for one document that covers both.

mailchimp-type

MailChimp’s style for typography is direct and shows each font and usage. The style guide should include HTML specs as well for website styles. What elements use an H1 versus H2 versus H3 tag. (We’ll go into more detail about web specifics in the HMTL section.)

In addition, visual style guidelines should include a full description of when, how and where branding and logos can be used. This includes how the logo looks, if colors or fonts can be altered (typically not) and in what instances use is acceptable.

Writing Style

mailchimp-voice

Just as important as your visual style is the tone of the writing. It can be jarring for users to come see your brand material and it read light and silly in one instance and cold and sterile in another. How the words come together can help clients or users associated with your products, making a writing style vital.

Key parts of written style include tone; spelling and language; reader level or jargon; voice; structure; use of symbols, numbers and lists; branding or trademark usage; and overriding style guide of choice.

There are a handful of generally accepted written style guides for English-language publications. Most company style guides direct you to use one of these for questions on matters of usage and style.

AP Style: The Associated Press Stylebook is used by journalism and writing professionals in print and online. The style focuses on consistency and brevity and is common because of these attributes.

Chicago Style: The Chicago Manual of Style is used by academics and for scholarly works, businesses and includes the basics for a more formal style of writing.

MLA Style: The Modern languages Association style guide is most commonly used in academics, liberal arts and humanities.

MailChimp’s writing style guide includes great examples of press releases and how the site should read as well as how the brand interacts with customers on social media, the blog and how the company’s trademark jokes should be handled.

User Interface and HTML

PRL

If you are creating content for the web, you need rules for digital publication as well. While text, color and tone guidelines will be outlined in other guides, you should also note how the website and user interface should work. (The PRL guide is an excellent resource.)

Text: Explain HTML markup rules. What type of headers are used and how? What’s the difference in usage between an H2 or H3? In addition to usage, what markup does your site use? This is the part of the guide that details every usage.

Images: The rules for image use should be just as clear as for text. Do you have a specified width or height for every image? Is there a standard text wrap or border size? How should alt tags be used. Make sure to answer each of these questions clearly.

Naming and saving files: In addition to how things should look, consider a little web housekeeping. How should files be named and saved in the CMS? Set clear guidelines so that your file maintenance is clean and files are saved at manageable sizes and are easy to find.

Coding practices: Determine and set forth coding standards for HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Include examples.

User Interface: If you did not include a visual guide for user interface elements and workings, include it here. What types of inputs are used and how are they labeled? (Do you use words like “Continue,” “Submit,” or “OK?”) Include a “kit” of your site’s user interface elements and usage.

In Conclusion

 

The best way to get started with creating a must have style guide is to contact:

brand research and development

Go ahead. Request a free evaluation!

Original Author / Carrie Cousins
Original Source / Design Shack

 

 

 


1 Comment

How People Discover New Brands

The most effective method for brand discovery remains articles published in mainstream media outlets, according to a recent report by GlobalWebIndex.

However, consumers are increasingly engaging with this content in digital form, rather than finding it in print.

Asked how they discover new brands, products, or services, 47% of 16-24 year-olds and 45% of 55-65 year-olds cited articles posted on the websites of newspapers and magazines. That’s nearly double the number (20% and 27%, respectively) who discover brands via articles published in the print versions of newspapers and magazines.

After newspaper and magazine articles published on the Web, the next most common method for discovering new brands is recommendations from real-life friends. Consumer comments on message boards is third, and results from search engines is fourth.

Advertisements and celebrity endorsements land in the middle of the pack, as do recommendations from digital friends and blogger reviews.

The least common method for finding new brands is via deals on group buying websites, such as Groupon.

brand-discovery-gwi-2013

Author / Ayaz Nanji
Source / marketingprofs.com


Leave a comment

Sandy officials use Web resources to keep residents up to date

Enhance The Experience: Fundamental to Branding

At RED, we know that delivering a one-of-a-kind engaging experience is one way to reach customers. But we’ve seen time and again that creating an emotionally-valued experience within them gives us a deeper view into the mindset of the customer. This view reveals the hidden behavioral triggers that motivate their decision making.

See what Nicole Martin, Communications Director for Sandy City, has to say about RED.

It is always a challenge to keep an ever-growing community aware and involved in the goings-on of their city. In the summer of 2013, RED helped Sandy City build a new website that did just that.

SANDY — Decisions being made in the Legislature will impact some laws more than others, and Sandy residents can find out that information on a new website.

Sandy_City_Gov_Building

SANDY — Decisions being made in the Legislature will impact some laws more than others, and Sandy residents can find out that information on a new website.As Sandy’s population continues to get bigger, communications between residents and the city government sometimes gets smaller.”It’s so difficult to get information out and receive information back from your citizens. You really work hard at it,” Sandy Mayor Tom Dolan said.Dolan has seen plenty of City Council meetings where there were more councilmen than residents. And yet tough decisions still have to be made.”The biggest failure is communications,” said Nicole Martin, Sandy spokeswoman. “If you’re not communicating, then your residents have no idea what you’re doing.”Although communications with residents is something cities everywhere have a difficult time with, Sandy is trying something not many have tried before.”What’s different about Sandy now is what we call our online information dashboard,” Martin said.

sandy_now

Sandynow.com is a website. Most cities have websites, Twitter and Facebook pages, as well as old-fashioned newsletters to communicate with residents.But Sandy is bringing all that together with constant updates to let residents know what’s going on. The city is following the legislative session this month to post information affecting its residents.”With today’s technology, it’s not enough for cities to kind of passively communicate and hope their residents are informed,” Martin said.Dolan remembers scrolling through city information on a cable-access TV channel years ago and called the experience “the most boring thing in the world.”He’s amazed at how far technology has come and how it’s so crucial for cities to use it to make sure residents are informed.”It’s getting much better because people are more technologically advanced and this is the way they communicate,” Dolan said.Dolan understands not everyone has the Internet and said newsletters and announcements will still be mailed to residents.

By Alex Cabrero                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=28541824#uKYMlX4fL2TVj5jr.99


Leave a comment

Personalized products and content-led conversation will win in 2014

The global e-commerce industry is expected to generate $1.2 trillion in sales by the end of this year, driven largely by the changing shopping habits of consumers, as they increasingly browse and buy across mobile, tablet and even social networks. Despite this predicted growth, 2014 will not be a year for retailers to rest on their laurels.

human-head-with social-network-icons

Retailers will have access to more information about their customers’ preferences and shopping habits than ever before and retailers must take steps to better understand the purchase journey. This insight will give retailers the understanding they need to develop relevant content and personalize deals, and ultimately help to generate more sales. Shoppers are looking for a richer, more personal shopping experience and retailers must reassess both how they sell and what they sell if they are to thrive.

Here are 5 top tips for those retailers wanting to stand out from the crowd next year using personalization:

1.     Content shopping will be king
The lines between entertainment and shopping are blurring further and 2014 will see more retailers offer shoppers a richer, content-led shopping experience. Driven by the media, which have become retailers in their own right to bolster dwindling revenues from advertising and subscriptions, savvy retailers are using multimedia content to make the shopping experience more engaging. Retailers recognize that shoppers are no longer satisfied by the vending machine model of the last decade; they want to be entertained and informed as they browse the web and make purchasing decisions.

2.     Social will steer retailers’ stocking decisions
Social media’s power to influence what people buy is widely recognized and in 2014 it will also influence what retailers sell. The rapid growth of social curation communities like Pinterest, where consumers curate their own collections of products that they like, offers retailers access to invaluable insights in near real-time, something that traditional market research simply cannot compete with. Savvy retailers will use social shopping communities as a temperature check for popular product trends and use this insight to inform and refine stocking decisions.

3.     Omni-channel will require a single customer view
In any given day a shopper could interact with a brand on multiple devices and through multiple platforms, from mobile browsing in the morning, to lunchtime shopping on a work laptop. In 2014, a top priority for retailers will be to join-up the dots between these channels so that a more comprehensive customer profile can be developed. Insight garnered by analyzing the purchase journey of shoppers will help retailers to streamline the channels through which they sell and personalize the shopping experience, helping to boost bottom lines.

4.     Hyper targeting will take the online personalization in-store
The long-held dream of being able to target shoppers in real-time, with relevant and personalized location-based offers took a big step forward in 2013 with Apple’s launch of iBeacon, which allows precise, low-cost indoor tracking in stores. There has been much excitement about the prospect of hyper-targeting shoppers on the go and in 2014 retailers will begin to take this proposition more seriously. We expect to see a number of high profile trials of hyper-targeting technology as retailers grapple to deliver the highly personalized experience that shoppers now expect online in their high street stores.

5.     Mass customization will make products feel personal
Consumers today want something that’s unique and reflects their personality. Retailers understand this and we are seeing more companies offer personalized products, from custom engravings to the ability to select bag zip or pocket colour in advance. There is a huge opportunity for small to medium enterprises to carve out a market niche against bigger retailers, while adding value to existing products through customization. Furthermore, the concept of customization should extend beyond the product itself; retailers need to look at how they can offer a more customized shopping experiences online by using insights gathered in customer profiles.

by Shingo Murakam


Leave a comment

‘What Would I Say?’ Generates Whimsical Status Updates

HT_facebook_status_what_would_i_say

Making a good first impression matters, even in social media. So why not outsource your next status update to a piece of software?

By

What Would I Say?,” a site created by a group of graduate students at Princeton University, quickly writes up witty status updates to post.

Granted, not everything the site spits out is Facebook gold. Many times, they’re gibberish. The site itself also acknowledges that it’s not perfect. “We’re not trying to predict the best status update,” said one of the developers during a conference call today with ABC News. “Just the funny ones.”

What Would I Say was developed by Vicky Yao, Ugne Klibaite, Daniel Jiang, Pawel Przytycki, Edward Young, Harvey Cheng, Max Homilius and Alex Furger.

The site uses what’s called a Markov model to figure out what to write. After sifting through a Facebook user’s status updates, the site picks one word and starts calculating probabilities of other words that are likely to follow. Eventually creating a sentence.

The developers also add that though Markov models may not serve much practical use here, they are definitely valuable research tools for their own fields of research. “It’s used to help with natural language processing, to look at genomic sequences, and to help build telescopes,” one of the developers said.

While Facebook users have to grant What Would I Say access their profiles, it doesn’t store any of the information. “We don’t store any of your personal information anywhere,” the website’s “about” section states. “In fact, we don’t even have a database!”


Leave a comment

Interview with “A List Apart” Founder Jeffrey Zeldman

Jeffrey Zeldman is certainly one of the world’s most renowned personalities in Web. Guru of Web standards Zeldman is also an entrepreneur, web designer, author, podcaster and acclaimed speaker.

He has been blogging independent web content since 1995. He was one of the first pioneers of Web Standards, and is creator and editor-in-chief of A List Apart and founder of web design studio Happy Cog.

We were with him at the Future of Web Apps event that took place in London in October.

www.zeldman.com | Twitter: @zeldman

jeffry-zeldman

Awwwards Team: You’ve been involved in a lot of projects since 1995. The Web Standards Project, Happy Cog, A List Apart…How do you find the time?

Well, the Web Standards Project I’m not involved with anymore. It’s a pretty quiet thing now. Some friends and I started it in the ’90s, Steve Champeon, Jeff Veen, Dori Smith, Tim Bray…

When we started nobody cared about web standards. We made up the word, because there were no web standards, there were just some W3C recommendations that nobody paid attention to and there were four versions of scripting languages. One was Javascript. And so all that stuff has been taken care of. There’s a new group called Future Friendly that’s sort of picking up the ball and saying “Okay, now for the next generation of devices, how do we approach this again?”

There could be a new Web Standards Project tomorrow, say for TVs, I think. Phones tend to have Webkit or Opera browsers, or Chrome browsers, and it’s good, so though I’m simplifying, that’s not too much of a problem. But TVs have browsers now and people are going to want to navigate using a TV remote,and a TV browser isn’t necessarily a fully-fledged Webkit or Mozilla or Opera or IE browser, so you really don’t know what you’re getting. I think there’s always work to be done.

jeffry-zeldman-a-list-apart

Then there’s A List Apart. We’re in the middle of a redesign, it’s launching at the beginning of the new year. It will continue in the vein that we started, but it will have more features. I started the magazine in 1998 and every 2 weeks a new issue would come out and usually there were 2 articles in the issue and that was the whole thing. It was always a magazine. I thought of it like a magazine, I ran it like a magazine and so it’s not a blog and it’s not constantly putting out content.

Our focus will continue to be very well-vetted, carefully-edited, carefully-researched articles that try to advance the craft of web design, focusing on content strategy or responsive design or some other aspect of the craft. But we’re going to have columns- we have some really brilliant people lined up as columnists- and we’re going to have a blog. We’re launching with those two additional content features just to get people used to the idea that there’s more frequent content. We don’t want to introduce everything new at once because we would lose our focus and also it would take a huge staff and we don’t have that. We’re going to roll out new features a bit at a time and see how our community responds, but we have a lot of other secret, wonderful features coming.

The design is already beautiful and the new design is really beautiful, impactful and very magazine-like. Jason Santamaria did the last design and it had sort of a literary quality. He was trying to evoke the feeling that this was a library for web designers and he did it very skilfully, and now Mike Pick and Tim Murtaugh are redesigning and it’s going back to the magazine idea, a modern magazine like Esquire (which is actually an old magazine but always has modern art direction). I think it’ll be very interesting to see how the community responds.

We have an editorial staff and we’re constantly reviewing submissions. There’s a lot of stuff we send to other publications because it’s good, but it’s not quite right for us, or sometimes things feel like a rehash, like they’re not really new. We have a very high bar. That’s why we don’t publish all the time, because we’re really trying to advance the craft of web design and digital experience design generally and that means that we have to say no to a lot of content that gets submitted to us. There’s a good place for that content but we’re just not it.

Even though we have a wonderful acquisitions editor, a wonderful editor-in-chief, and a whole team of technical editors, I still write the blurbs when the issue is about to go live. I’ve always done that and it wouldn’t somehow feel like A List Apart if I stopped. If I ever stop doing that I’m sure it’ll be great, and I’m sure other writers would pick up where I left off, but there’s just something about doing it that feels right to me.

Happy Cog. Our editorial headquarters are in New York which is where I am, and we have client services headquarters in Austin and Philadelphia. They do wonderful work so I’m able to delegate a lot of that work. I don’t have to be hands on and I can focus on the editorial side. I meet the clients and I know what’s going on and it’s wonderful, but I don’t have to supervise the projects. I stopped doing client projects only about a year ago.

Do you mind not doing them?

jeffry-zeldman-a-book-apart

It’s mixed. Is feels like a relief in some ways, after 20 years of doing client services. To not necessarily have to call a client on a given day is kind of a nice thing in a way. I love clients, I fall in love with our clients. I always have good relationships with them. We pick our clients carefully, so I miss it too. And then delegating is a strange thing because on the one hand, you trust the people that you’ve hired and they’re really good, they really know their job. But at the same time you’re not doing it, so there’s a sense of loss and fear of “Is it still Happy Cog if I’m not doing everything?”

The self-aggrandizing fantasy I have about it is it’s like Walt Disney. When he started he animated every frame, he did all the animation and all the drawing at first, and eventually he did none of it. So there’s some kind of arc there, I’m somewhere on that arc. I’m definitely not Walt Disney, but that’s how I’m able to feel comfortable with it. This is a natural evolution and this is what I’m supposed to be doing. I love the editorial stuff. I think I’ll do more client services again, but right now it’s just nice to have a break and focus on the magazine and the books and the conference.

Jason Santamaria, Mandy Brown and I founded A Book Apart, and we have new books every few months. Mandy is the editor, so I’m involved in acquisition and content but I don’t actually have to do the hard, in-depth manual work of reading each draft and revising the work with the author (though we have great authors so not much revision is needed). So that’s how I’m able to do all these different things. The conference has a great staff, An Event Apart, and we have 8 shows a year now.

Who’s in charge of looking for talent and trends and content for an Event Apart, and how do you go about it?

My partner Eric Meyer and I do that. I see what people are talking about on our stage, I see what we’re doing at Happy Cog and what my friends are doing at their studios and it’s kind of easy to see. You run up against a problem like “What do we do about responsive images?”, you read other people’s blogs to find out what they’re saying about it, you find the smartest people talking about the stuff, some of them I work with, some of them I speak with at An Event Apart or at other conferences.

We’re always looking for people who have made a difference in the industry. Luke Wroblewksi with mobile, Ethan Marcotte with responsive, Karen McGrane with adaptive content and Kristina Halvorson with content strategy. These are people who’ve made a huge difference and are great speakers. That’s really important because some people are gifted writers, but on stage they freeze up, they’re not natural, they’re not funny. We’re constantly looking for new people to bring along because we don’t eventually want to be a bunch of 70-year-olds: “You saw them for the last 10 years, come see them again!”. We’re not just going to keep bringing the same stuff out every year.

We structure the days like playlists and we’ll start with someone really strong on a particular topic and then we’ll make sure the next speaker has a related topic but a slightly different angle on it. Maybe the middle speaker is less experienced, so we’ll sandwich them between two really strong speakers. They may turn out to be the hit of the show. I really think of it like music, like making an ideal playlist. It’s not just how great is that song, but how great is that song after this other song? We try to make sure there’s an educational narrative running through the two-day conference and we really try to take a holistic approach. Are you going to get a pretty strong overview of the most important issues that we’re all wrestling with right now? What do I do about mobile? What do I do about content? How do I not design the whole website and then beg for the content the day it’s due? How do I deal with all these new devices? How do I avoid all these traps and problems?

I used to make a joke that there are 500 standard breakpoints in Android. Android is like Windows in a way, like Windows used to be. Apple was always “We make an operating system for our own computers, and here are the three models of our computer this year, and buy one of those because that’s what you’ve got to choose from”. Windows was always, “Hey, we don’t care if you’ve got a really new computer or an old one”, and by being compatible with all those different devices they offered a different experience. Windows meant you could basically have $5 and still have a PC, and that was wonderfully democratic but because they didn’t know the capabilities of each screen and everything else, it was a complicated operating system, and buggy, and you might not have a great experience. And I think that’s true with Android too. Android is along that line. The phone has all kinds of capabilities and features, depending who manufactures it.

Originally when the iPhone came out it really excited people in mobile. “Now I can really design a good thing for mobile”. But they were like, “Well, now I can design for this screen.” But when Android came out they were like “Oh, there’s too many screen sizes, now what will I do?”. Responsive is one answer to that, and there are other answers as well, but the idea that you can just design for one screen size is gone, I think.

Responsive is one answer to that, and there are other answers as well, but the idea that you can just design for one screen size is gone, I think.

Is everything you do at Happy Cog now responsive, or are there still projects that aren’t?

I would have to say just about everything is. I did a fixed-width responsive design for my site, which doesn’t make sense, except it does, it works. I have a hard time myself because I think we’re doing some really gorgeous stuff now with responsive, but it’s a challenge. If you buy into the hallucination that we have some control over the canvas, and you set up a fixed-width, it is easier to do a design that feels controlled and very elegant, very finished. Just like if you’re designing for a particular screen size you could go, “I’m going to fill this part of the screen with this”. We like that, we like our canvases. It’s harder thinking outside the canvas. I think there’s an explosion of new ideas in design, but then some responsive designs are absolutely gorgeous.

When clients come to Happy Cog, to what extent do you have to evangelize to them about content-first and accessibility and web standards?

The beauty of it is, most of the clients who come to us come to us because of our reputation and they often come having read A List Apart, and maybe reading A Book Apart books. So when they come to Happy Cog, we don’t generally have to sell them a content strategy, they come wanting it. We don’t have to sell them on web standards, they know that we do that. That’s why they’re coming.

I think, this is a generalization, but people in the same field tend to hire us. In other words, someone who read “Designing with Web Standards” and worked as a designer, and is now maybe a content director at a company, brings us in. Their boss may bring in another studio that’s more corporate, bigger, better-known in the corporate world, and so then we sort of compete for the job, but if we’re hired the people who hire us want what we have. That’s the marketing we do. A List Apart started before Happy Cog, so A List Apart is Happy Cog’s marketing but we don’t do the magazine for that reason. We do the magazine to try to advance the industry but then, because we happen to have a company that does stuff, people who care about the industry will go “Well, let’s give these people a shot, they seem to know what they’re doing.”

So you tend to get quite ideal clients in a way?

Yes, we tend to get really smart, wonderful clients. No job is ideal, and no client is ideal, we’re not ideal. We’re all people, so there’s always something unexpected that happens. Something needs to get done faster than we agreed, or the portion of the budget we thought we had for research dries up. There’s always some kind of negotiation, but we have really good Project Managers too. That makes a huge difference.

When I started Happy Cog it was originally just me freelancing, and I was putting together small teams of freelancers in the beginning and that was cool but we didn’t have Project Managers. I was like “I’m a Creative Director and I’m a Project Manager”. That doesn’t work so well. I mean, it worked well in that we did great projects, and I had nice relationships with the clients and we fought for good work and everything, but I wasn’t necessarily going to get up early in the morning and call the client and say “Here’s what we’re doing today”. Clients really like hand-holding, and the more money they’re spending the more they need that. And it makes sense. I can’t imagine taking $100,000, giving it to someone and waiting three weeks to see if they had something to say to me. Now we have these brilliant Project Managers who are constantly checking in with the clients and making sure everyone’s on the same page, everyone knows what’s expected that day and everyone knows what we’re working on, and if there’s a quibble about something that it gets back to the right people, it’s addressed. That makes a huge difference, it’s one of the most important things. Nobody talks about it.

What made you realize you needed that?

Having done without it, and then hiring people like Dave DeRuchie to do it in Philadelphia and seeing what a difference it makes to have really brilliant people at the top of their game handling that, so that designers can design and coders can code and everyone can relax and do their jobs and not worry about someone being angry because you forgot something.

We’ve almost never had an unhappy client, but once I had an unhappy relationship with a client. I thought we were speaking the same language and I thought from our contract and everything else that it was clear what we were and weren’t delivering, but the client somehow had in his mind that we were responsible for putting all the content on his website. We delivered these templates and style guides and content guides, and we gave him these “For instance” pages, and we had a content strategist and an editorial person on that project, more than design studios did back then. But it got to the point where he was never going to be happy, and he was never going to pay, and we were never going to finish so…not always ideal.

You learn from that, and I learned two things from that. One is I’m glad I incorporated because if I wasn’t incorporated and things had gone really wrong I could have lost my apartment, been selling pencils on the street. And the other thing I learned was that I needed a really good Project Manager. I shouldn’t assume my clients get it, I shouldn’t assume they’re so smart, they’re so cool, they get it. We’re very lucky that usually that’s the case. I mean, we work for it too, but we tend to have clients who get what we do and want what we do and understand what we do. But every once in awhile we’re not going to have that and so you just need someone who very clearly says “This is what the studio’s responsible for, here’s what we’re doing.”

Trends and Future in Web Design

What trends do you see coming in web design?

I think people are getting our content in different ways, they’re finding it in different ways and they’re using different devices and, for good or evil, web-capable TVs are the next thing. So I think we have to keep on thinking about mobile-first and content-first, I think we have to keep on figuring out what to do with tiny devices that have high-res screens and may have fast bandwidth but may have slow bandwidth. I think there’s a lot of stuff to figure out. How do we keep using standards? How do we develop new standards? I think given the wide range of devices and use-cases, one of my favorite imponderable questions is “I have a screen that wants high-res Retina images, but I’m on 3G”.

How do we keep using standards? How do we develop new standards? I think HTML5 is key.

What do you send me? And how do you know if I’m on 3G? 50% of the time people are using their mobile in their home or office, where they have fast bandwidth. I don’t know, I have no way of knowing what your bandwidth is so what do I send you? Whatever I send you I’m going to make somebody unhappy. Is there some other way to go about it? Can we just carefully choose our images, like, “I’m going to use watercolors where even if it’s medium resolution, it still looks cool”. Can we blur the background so that there’s less bandwidth even if it’s high-def? There’s lots of stuff to think about, there’s lots of new challenges. I think responding to all those new challenges now, when we’re moving kind of faster than reason, that’s a big challenge now.

And then taking better advantage of mobile. Taking better advantage of geo-location and built-in cameras and all that stuff, whether native or Web App. Taking better advantage of those things.

I think HTML5 is key, because it’s so semantic and has new content semantics like “article” and “section”. I think it’s made for the way we’re publishing now and I think we’re going to see big changes in how CMSs are designed to accommodate mobile and orbital content and I think we’re going to see an end of pages, in a way. We’re going to stop focusing so much on pages and start focusing on content chunks, and how we structure them and how we design them for different use-cases, different devices.

Which technologies are you focusing on right now?

Our front-end developers are using Less and Sass now, not just CSS. Less and Sass are CSS preprocessors that can speed up development, so our front-end people are using those. We’re studying the problem of Retina images and what to do about that. We’re looking into and working in native. But mainly we’re using good, structural HTML5.

Who’s leading the way into the future?

jeffry-zeldman-future-leading

Luke Wroblewski is pretty brilliant on mobile. We have him speaking a lot at An Event Apart, he’s one of our favorite speakers, he’s really funny. This is a guy who when I first saw him was talking about web forms, the most boring subject you could possibly pick, and making it fascinating. I saw him at South by South-West five years ago. South by South-West is a festival. There aren’t many presentations by individual speakers but he was making one. It can be very crowded. It’s a really wonderful festival but it’s not necessarily the best environment to hear an individual speaker speak on a technical topic. But Luke had the whole room enthralled and I thought, “This guy can talk about anything, he’s amazing”. I think he’s really smart. He was a lead designer at Yahoo for 10 years, so he’s had a lot of experience. I think he’s leading the way.

My very humble friend Ethan Marcotte with responsive design, who worked at Happy Cog until recently, absolutely brilliant guy. Jeremy Keith from Brighton and his partners at Clearleft, Richard Rutter, Andy Budd, I think they’re really brilliant. Jeremy Keith is a really great thinker. Eric Meyer, my partner. I think Kristina Halvorson has been amazing with content strategy and it changing the whole industry. I think she’s done for content what I tried to do for web standards.

I think Karen McGrane, who’s talking about adaptive content now, just a really brilliant person. When she was very young she was basically the first information architect, at Razorfish. She trained so many people, she trained Liz Danzico who now runs the School of Visual Arts MFA in Interaction Design program in New York. She trained the people who trained the people who trained the people. Some people get 20 years into the business and they’re sort of burned out, but she’s still really young because she started young. Karen is really vital and she’s leading a whole new way of thinking about content management systems and content distribution. These are some of the people that I think are pointing the way. I’m leaving a lot out and I feel bad, I hope none of them are reading this. We try to publish at A Book Apart the people who we think really have something very important to say.

Well, thanks so much.

A pleasure!

BY Awwwards Team